Thursday, June 26, 2008

The Claremont University Project

Claremont School of Theology is experiencing what can only be characterized as a renaissance. Those of you familiar with the European Renaissance understand well that those great gains were made in religion, science, art and the humanities by looking back to the Greco-Roman roots of Western Society. Only by looking back could Europe have moved forward.

The same is happening at Claremont. Many of us know that the School was founded as a theological and educational experiment, as a center for ecumenical education in a mid-century nation largely opposed to intra-religious dialogue. Over 50 years later, Claremont is now building on this ecumenical foundation to re-invent itself as an innovative center for the preparation of leaders in an intentionally diverse and interfaith context.

Earlier this spring, the School’s Board of Trustees adopted new statements of mission, vision and values. At their most recent meeting, the Board voted to take the next step and transition the School into a small focused university, organized around the School of Theology while adding new schools and programs that explore issues related to religious belief, practice and leadership. These schools will include the traditional theological disciplines (such as textual studies, theology, history, and worship) as well as emerging fields like religion and politics, sustainability, interfaith education and world spiritualities.

You may have heard recently that the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life released a second report from their major survey about religiosity in the U.S. (I commented on the first report in an earlier blog post.) While the entire 268-page document may take a while for most of us to digest, their summary findings are intriguing nonetheless. In short, the survey finds that most Americans have non-dogmatic approaches to their faith. The report summary says:

A majority of those who are affiliated with a religion … do not believe their religion is the only way to salvation. And almost the same number believes that there is more than one true way to interpret the teachings of their religion. This openness to a range of religious viewpoints is in line with the great diversity of religious affiliation, belief and practice that exists in the United States

These findings reinforce the direction in which Claremont is heading. As we prepare to enter the second decade of the twenty-first century, those of us in theological education realize that religion is changing dramatically. For example, we are discovering that religious leaders from immigrant communities in Southern California which are predominantly Hindu, Islamic, and Buddhist have emerging needs for what Christians call “pastoral counseling” in the form of hospital visits, grief counseling, or domestic abuse counseling, which are practices that largely do not exist in the native contexts of these traditions. Claremont is uniquely equipped to welcome leaders from these traditions into our community and learn together about how we can help each other adapt—and creatively transform—our communities.

In short, the Claremont University Project will educate religious leaders (across the Judeo-Christian spectrum as well as those from the world’s great traditions) to be religiously multi-lingual and ethically grounded to improve the lives of those in our communities. As I have written elsewhere, we need leaders in all walks of life who have “a combination of ethical integrity, knowledge of their own faith, as well as substantial understanding or other faiths, and the experience of and appreciation for other cultures.”­

As we move forward with our plans, I welcome your comments and feedback. Together we will make a difference in the twenty-first century.

3 comments:

Ron Hines said...

I'm intrigued by the proposal for a small university centered around the School of Theology. It sounds like a good way to do what Dean Freudenberger said of his pioneering work in environmental sustainability when he first came to Claremont: It put “the world in the school and the school in the world.”

This reflects both an affirmation and an anxiety about the new proposal. If it brings together disparate disciplines in concern for real-life concerns of people in and outside of faith communities, "Bravo!" If it burdens the School of Theology with yet more dominance by fractionating academic "disciplines," each enforcing its own narrowing perspective, then we should think twice about the proposal.

Rev. Joseph P. Shore said...

I am excited and thrilled as the CST community continues to meet challenges in an ever changing landsape of faith, ritual, and dialogue.

pireland said...

How do you have a "School of Theology" with no mention of God in your mission, vision, or values?

Theology does literally mean "Study of God".

Maybe rename the institute "Claremont School of Anthropology"? Because clearly you focus on man and not God, which is a more honest name.